Three Pedestrians Injured, One Gravely, in Two Separate Car Accidents on Estes Drive

Chapel Hill residents at a Jan. 7 “Walk to Slow Traffic on Estes Drive” held a week after two teens were struck by a vehicle while crossing the road.


By Gregory DL Morris

Two middle-school students were struck by a car while they were in a crosswalk on Estes Drive December 31, one remains in the hospital in very serious condition; less than two weeks later another pedestrian was struck by a car while crossing Estes Drive. Both drivers have been charged by police.

Together the two accidents have brought the safety of pedestrians and cyclists to the fore at a time when Chapel Hill is in the midst of a development boom that will significantly increase both vehicle and foot traffic around the town.

On Friday, December 31, at about 5:30 p.m., Norma Martin, 69, of Durham, who was driving an SUV, struck two children, ages 13 and 14, as they used a marked crosswalk to walk south across Estes Drive toward Caswell Road near the entrance to Guy B. Phillips Middle School.

According to the town’s statement on January 5, “the 13-year-old victim remains at UNC Hospitals with life-threatening injuries. The 14-year-old victim was released from UNC Hospitals and is recovering from serious injuries.” There has been no update on the 13-year-old.

The Chapel Hill Police Department investigation found that the victims entered the marked crosswalk after westbound drivers yielded to them. Martin, who was driving east toward Franklin Street, did not yield and struck the victims. Martin stayed at the scene after the crash. She has been charged with failure to yield to pedestrians in a clearly marked crosswalk or regular pedestrian crossing. The stretch of Estes Drive where the children were struck is under the jurisdiction of the state Department of Transportation.

In the other incident Chapel Hill Police charged a driver involved in a crash that injured a pedestrian at Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Estes Drive the morning of Tuesday January 11.

Chapel Hill Town Council member Adam Searing told TLR in advance of a Jan. 12 council meeting, “although pedestrian safety is not on the official agenda for this evening’s meeting, given the two incidents of pedestrians getting injured I, and I am sure others, will want to talk about this tonight. I attended the [Jan. 7] Estes neighborhood march for safety last Friday evening and spoke to several folks there about their concerns. One parent asked me about doing an evaluation of crosswalk safety near all our schools. I think that is an excellent idea.”

Searing explained further that, “a separate bike/pedestrian path and improvements along Estes are needed and they have been approved and funded; construction started before the new year. However, these improvements were delayed again because of what I understand as an issue with location of a natural-gas line. I would like to see construction start as soon as possible, especially after these recent injuries to our pedestrians. As a life-long cyclist I believe that separating cars, bicyclists, and pedestrian traffic with completely separate multi-use paths and greenways is the best way to improve safety.”

More broadly Searing added that “these pedestrian injuries should make clear to all of us that the costs of runaway development need to be considered on the whole town and not just project by project. We currently have 30-40 proposed new developments right now in Chapel Hill – and many of them quite large, with hundreds of units. Each of those projects will affect traffic around it but, as a whole, the breakneck pace of current development in town will likely have a much greater overall effect. We need to consider and plan town-wide rather than just with each development.”

The struggle to manage the growing volumes of vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles that use the town’s roads is not new. The Central West Small Area Plan, prepared for the town by consultancy Rhodeside & Harwell Vanasse Hangen Brustlin in November 2013, specifically cited Estes Drive for “perceived lack of safety, traffic congestion at peak hours, and lack of basic bicycle and pedestrian amenities.” That situation “became a major focus and driving force” underlying the development of the plan.

“Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard and Estes Drive are unfriendly to pedestrians and bicyclists,” the plan stated. “They have discontinuous and/or absent sidewalks and crosswalks, lack of bike lanes, and allow for the rapid movement of vehicles causing the area to feel unsafe and unwelcoming to those choosing alternative modes of transportation.”

The plan made several recommendations for the town, the first of which was “work with the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools, including parents and administrators, to consider road crossing improvements at the intersection of the schools and Estes Drive.”

Other recommendations included:

-Implement crosswalk improvements throughout the entire area,
with particular attention being paid to intersections and bus stops;

-Have town staff investigate the appropriate location of a traffic circle or light;

-Defining important bicycle and pedestrian crossing locations, and increasing the visibility of pedestrians and bicyclists;

-Implementing traffic calming measures;

-Having conversations with the North Carolina Department of Transportation about lowering the speed on Estes Drive.

Inquiries were made on Tuesday the 11th to town officials about pedestrian safety measures taken in the wake of the accidents, and also about the status of the Central West Small Area Plan findings and recommendations. Town officials indicated that responses would be sent, but none had been received by 5:00 pm Friday.

Share This Article

Scroll down to make a comment.

3 Comments on "Three Pedestrians Injured, One Gravely, in Two Separate Car Accidents on Estes Drive"

  1. Happy to learn Adam Searing reminded the council of the safety concerns and suggestions in the Central West plan. Local drivers on Estes Dr. can have an impact on safety by lowering their own speed to 30 mph without the benefit of waiting for DOT action and stopping at yellow lights. Particularly when turning off MLK on Estes; this simple step enables oncoming traffic to turn safely.

  2. It would seem that a photo from the rally to protest traffic conditions on Estes Drive would have included a REPORT on this rally. Why was this not considered newsworthy? There was an incident, and this rally was a response!

  3. I write to second the comnent by Buffie Webber above. Estes Dr has its issues but to me, the biggest issue is drivers in too great a hurry, many traveling 5-15 mph over the posted 35 mph limit.
    This is true all over town. Franklin St. is a raceway and speed on MLK Blvd has long been outrageously fast. Running of red lights all over town is not only commonplace but expected by drivers to one’s rear.
    Chief Blue, I know you have issues with staffing but have you considered aggressive ticketing, including public transit, commercial, and especially folks who obviously have time management problems but don’t address it?
    Oh, and quit announcing where your traffic patrols are going to be. Would you tell a bank robber where security was and was not? I think not. So, don’t tell speeders where traffic patrols will and will not be. I sit at bus stops and watch, I walk, I KNOW of what I speak. Let the slings and arrows of my “victim blaming” begin.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.