Vote AGAINST Rezoning 1200 and 1204 MLK


By Christopher Bowers

Stackhouse Properties told the town of Chapel Hill that if they do not get zoning approval to erect a four-story self-storage facility on the property they own at 1200 and 1204 MLK Jr. Blvd., they will sell the property and have already received an offer from a buyer who likely will evict the 70+ families who live in the Tar Heel Mobile Home Park (MHP) that currently occupies the site. As a neighbor across the street, I am appalled by a huge storage facility imposed on the community, and I am disappointed in our Town Council for giving in to the owner’s rezoning request. A simple majority of council members voted on March 3 to approve this project. If none change their mind before March 10, then the project will get final approval to move forward. 

Our elected officials admit that they have kicked the can down the road on protecting mobile home park residents for years now, and Stackhouse is exploiting this., then other developers will take notice and use these same tactics.

Some residents’ homes may be too old to be moved and so may be destroyed in transit. These are our neighbors, they are homeowners, and they should not be subjected to being displaced at will by development, or be forced to live within 20 feet of a football-field-sized storage facility. Twenty feet is about half the length of a telephone pole! This kind of development is not happening on Gimghoul Road.   

The council is willing to trust that this developer will treat the residents with dignity as the developer moves some homes and constructs a massive facility. The Town Council trusts that this developer will not back out of the “protections” that have been included in this deal, and will not harass residents into leaving on their own once the land is rezoned.

The Town Council MUST take a stand against this behavior, and they MUST fight for the most vulnerable members of our community. Currently, the average rent being paid by Tar Heel MHP residents is $500 per month, yielding [gross] revenue of over $400,000 a year! It would be a lose-lose for the developer to give up that income stream. We need to consider other options, like rezoning 1204 MLK as a manufactured home district that disincentivizes evicting the residents.

Chapel Hill is a politically active community; if this can happen here, it can happen anywhere. The Town Council MUST vote NO to rezoning 1200 MLK for a storage facility on March 10. If this council will not consider actions that protect our residents from developments that no one wants, then a new council needs to be elected that will.

Christopher Bowers is a doctoral student in environmental science and engineering at UNC. He lives in Chapel Hill.

Share This Article

Scroll down to make a comment.

5 Comments on "Vote AGAINST Rezoning 1200 and 1204 MLK"

  1. Karen Lazarus | March 8, 2021 at 7:36 am | Reply

    This town has gone mad. You are destroying what use to be a beautiful community. There are hundreds of apts going up everywhere and now a giant storage facility uprooting residents. Shame on you council. I will certainly vote in tge next election.

  2. Well said Chris. This is pure blackmail!!

  3. Marilyn Pizer | March 8, 2021 at 10:39 am | Reply

    It is not appropriate that a huge storage facility be erected on a major entrance to Chapel Hill. More importantly, there is no guarantee that the residents of the mobile home park will be allowed to stay, and there is no place for them to go. The town must make a plan for them and all the other mobile home residents on the north side of Chapel Hill who are in danger of losing their homes to development.

  4. Linda K Brown | March 10, 2021 at 2:17 pm | Reply

    Well said!

  5. Townie who cares | March 15, 2021 at 11:42 am | Reply

    Well… It happened. Done deal. They voted to allow this.
    What I want to know is this:
    Does the “town” – defined as the people who plan on living here a long long time – Does the town actually want to put their money where their mouths are or not? NC laws do not allow the council or town Governments to do much in cases like this. And the investors are just doing what they do – making money. If the town is going to actually give this issue more than the lip service it always does, and pearl clutching BS when something totally predictable happens (like what JUST happened), then I wonder: Is anyone willing to step forward, form a group (profit or non-profit) to make a real plan for affordable housing, and remove the profit motive (which is driving this totally undesirable land use) or does everyone just want to rant about it while we fill our tanks at Sheets and enjoy the convenience of an easy to reach storage place? I’m so tired of the outrage after the fact.

    And yes – I would do it… I would lead. But I would need to get paid for my time, not because I’m greedy, but because the effort this needs requires many hours per week and I’m not independently wealthy. I wonder, is that the issue? Is there no one who can afford to get something going because no one has the ability to sacrifice the time/energy to try and get something off the ground, without getting compensated for their time? If so, that’s unfortunate and speaks volumes about how people who are wealthy enough to not be affected, are sitting on the sidelines watching their neighbors and town get screwed.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.